I promised myself I’d never switch blogging tools again1. Then yesterday I ran
I’ve tried static blogs before using Tinderbox, Octopress, Second Crack,
Blosxom, etc. They all work, some more easily than others, but they all took
too much effort and could be a dependency nightmare. Here’s why I’m trying Hugo
and finding it so encouraging:
Speed. Octopress/Jekyll took around 7 minutes to render my blog. That
was always a deterrent to publishing.
No dependencies. Hugo is written using Go and comes as
a single binary with no dependencies. A breath of fresh air compared to the
spiderweb of ruby gems and versions required by Jekyll/Octopress.
Live Reload. Hugo comes with a mini web server built in and renders the
site locally each time any content or template is changed and reloads the
browser instantly. This shortens the feedback loop so much that it feels
like I’m editing the static files directly.
Speaking of speed…
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
baty.net hugo 0 draft content 0 future content 1875 pages created 96 tags created 3 categories created in 579 ms
Rendering speed is no longer an issue.
The good news is that I don’t think I broke anything critical this time.
There’s still a lot of theme cleanup I’d like to do yet.
Converting from WordPress was surprisingly easy. I used a plugin by Cyrill Schumacher and had all of my 1800+ posts, images, etc. converted for use with Hugo in less than an hour. All links were preserved so I don’t need to create a bunch of rewrite rules in Apache like every other time I’ve done this. Every step was easier than expected so I just kept going!
UPDATE February 03, 2015: I think Hugo may be the best static site generating CMS available. That said, I’ve gone back to WordPress for baty.net. Mostly because I’m lazy.